opinion

Response to government’s AI White Paper

ID 23515

The Competition & Markets Authority (CMA) has published a response to the consultation of the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) on a proposed high level regulatory framework for and as regards the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in enterprises located in UK. To recall, the framework would consist of a set of key principles, including principles on AI fairness, AI transparency, AI safety and security, AI accountability, and AI contestability and redress which would then be transposed by individual regulators such as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) into adequate supervisory rules.
In its response paper, the CMA commends the DSIT on its consultation and expresses its full support for the proposed approach to regulation, which involves utilizing existing regulatory systems while establishing a central coordination function. The CMA believes this approach will enable „context-specific“ regulation that promotes innovation, is „proportionate, trustworthy, adaptable, clear, and collaborative“.
In its statement, the CMA specifically emphasizes that
– it fully supports the government’s decision to initially place the principles on a non-statutory basis as it is important to first evaluate the effectiveness of such, before moving on to making them statutory and thus mandatory.
– it is eager to receive more guidance from the DSIT as to the application of the principles within the regulator’s remit. In the meantime, the CMA has begun considering how the proposed principles apply to its own current and future responsibilities and looks forward to discussing this further with the government.
– it fully supports the DSIT’s intention to align the principles with the OECD’s AI Principles.
– it recognizes the importance of a central coordination function to support the implementation, monitoring, and development of the framework.
– it also fully supports the DSIT’s intention to avoid duplicating regulatory work and encourage utilizing existing institutions‘ expertise.
– it also supports cross-regulatory coordination and coherence, particularly through the Digital Regulation Cooperation Forum (DRCF). In this context, the CMA particularly notes its full support to implement a cross-sector and cross-regulatory sandbox so as to permit and foster ongoing innovation in AI in UK.

Other Features
companies
compliance
consumer protection
data protection
disclosure
eligibility
financial innovation
governance
insurance
process
regulatory
risk
standard
transparency
Date Published: 2023-06-01
Regulatory Framework: AI Framework
Regulatory Type: opinion
Asset Management
procedure

Haiti Sanctions: guidance

ID 26587
The UK government has published an updated version of its Haiti sanctions guidance relatin ...
Asset Management
consultation

Transparency of land ownership involving trusts consultation

ID 26574
Various UK government agencies, including the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Com ...
Asset Management
consultation

Smarter regulation and the regulatory landscape

ID 26571
The Department for Business and Trade has informed of the extension of its call for eviden ...
Asset Management
procedure

Reporting information to OFSI – what to do

ID 26488
The HM Treasury and Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) have published a n ...
  • Topic Filter

    Top Tag Search
    Top Tag Search
    Top Tag Search
    Top Tag Search
You are on the training version of RISP core with limited functions and data. Please subscribe to RISP core for professional or academic use. We supply free real time datasets for approved academic research; professional subscriptions start at 950€ plus VAT per annum.

Compare Listings