procedure

Adverse scenario for the 2023 European Securities and Markets Authority’s money market fund stress testing guidelines

ID 26389

The European Systemic Risk Board, ESRB, has issued a statement to inform of and published the adverse scenarios and latest guidelines for performing the next EU-wide money market fund stress test. The scenarios were developed by the ESRB’s Task Force on Stress Testing in cooperation with the European Central Bank (ECB) and ESRB Secretariat and were recently sent to ESMA for application.
##### In brief, the scenarios encompass the following systemic risks as they were identified as of November 2023:
In view of the ongoing geopolitical tensions caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the scenarios simulate further disruptions in the global supply chain, leading to higher prices and lower economic growth. Inflation is expected to further increase, not least caused by the ongoing wage-price spiral, which will in turn trigger expectations of policy responses, leading to higher market interest rates and yield curves along All maturity lines.
Additionally, as market interest rates increase, the financing costs of firms and households will rise, leading to slowing economic growth and deteriorating profitability outlooks of companies. At the same time, the increased borrowing costs increase expectations of defaults in both the business and private sector and significantly impact credit risks of banks, thereby driving up credit risk premiums and credit spreads globally. Banks will also suffer from their own high financing costs. The tightening of financing conditions worsens the economic outlook even further, leading in turn to volatility in the financial markets and sharp corrections in asset prices – also particularly in view of the large level of indebtness of countries stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic.

To derive the adverse scenario outcomes, firms must calculate the reaction of individual variables given a particular strain imposed on chosen triggers which represent potential sources of financial stability risks. Emphasis is thereby placed on swap rates, corporate and government credit spreads, foreign exchange rates, and securitizations. The calibration process utilizes a sample spanning from January 2008 to September 2023.

Other Features
assessment
bonds
CDS
credit
financial stability
inflation
interest rate
liquidity
MMF
model
rating
real estate
resilience
risk
securities
securitisation
stress testings
Ukrainian conflict
valuation
Event ID: ID 77997
Date Published: 2023-12-19
Regulatory Framework: Money Market Fund Regulation (MMFR)
Regulatory Type: procedure

Opinion of the European Systemic Risk Board of 10 October 2023 on the Swedish ...

ID 26371
The European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) has published an opinion that was drawn up by the ...

Recommendation of the European Systemic Risk Board of 13 November 2023 regarding ...

ID 26367
The European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) has issued a new recommendation regarding a notifi ...

Compliance report of Country-specific Recommendations of the European Systemic Risk ...

ID 25490
On October 25, 2023, the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) published its latest evaluati ...

ESRB Letter to the European Parliament – background information on the ...

ID 25226
The European Systemic Risk Board, ESRB, has published an open letter addressed at the Euro ...
  • Topic Filter

    Top Tag Search
    Top Tag Search
    Top Tag Search
    Top Tag Search
You are on the training version of RISP core with limited functions and data. Please subscribe to RISP core for professional or academic use. We supply free real time datasets for approved academic research; professional subscriptions start at 950€ plus VAT per annum.

Compare Listings