opinion

Réponse AFG à la consultation de la Commission Européenne sur la révision du niveau 1 de SFDR

ID 26441

The AFG responded to the EC’s Targeted Consultation on SFDR Implementation. As a reminder, the EC launched a targeted consultation and a public consultation on 14 September 2023 to assess the implementation of the SFDR. The focus of the consultation was directed towards legal certainty, the usability of the regulation, and proposals for enhancing the existing framework. The Commission sought insights into the practical implementation of SFDR, potential shortcomings, and its interaction with other elements of the European sustainable finance framework. The objective was to explore options for improving the overall framework.
The AFG published its response to the consultation, proposing various enhancements to the current framework:
The AFG suggests evolving the existing transparency regime towards a system with minimum criteria, which would help provide clearer guidance and expectations for asset managers.
They also propose linking a fund’s strategy and objectives to a measurable commitment level, ensuring that the categorization under Articles 6, 8, and 9 aligns with the fund’s ambition and sustainability focus.
Instead of using the concept of „sustainable investment,“ the AFG recommends focusing on a “measurable fund engagement“ in sustainable practices. The Sustainable Investment Framework could still serve as an indicator of a fund’s commitment to sustainability.
To ensure consistency and fairness, the AFG calls for equivalence between national labels and strategies equivalent to the EU’s PAB and CTB.
The AFG also proposes simplifying the questions asked in the context of the MiFID II sustainability preferences by aligning them with the product classification and reporting requirements.
In terms of reporting, the AFG recommends implementing a single reporting template for all products, which would streamline the process and make it easier for investors to compare funds.
Lastly, the AFG suggests a simplified entity-level reporting that includes only relevant and cross-sectoral PAI indicators, which would reduce the reporting burden on asset managers while still providing valuable insights for investors.

Other Features
agreement
assessment
auditing
banks
benchmark
bonds
capital management companies
CMU
companies
disclosure
DNSH
due diligence
eligibility
ESG - environmental factor
ESG - social factor
ESG disclosure
fees
financial advisors
financial stability
fund management
governance
green bonds
green taxonomy
greenwashing
insurance
investment firms
investor protection
investors
issuer
leverage
marketing
model
PAI
pension funds
performance
process
registration
regulatory
remuneration
reporting
risk
sales documents
shareholders
standard
surveys
sustainability
transparency
Date Published: 2023-12-21
Regulatory Framework: Sustainable Finance
Regulatory Type: opinion

L’ESMA publie son rapport final portant sur les modifications de la méthodologie ...

ID 26552
The AFG published it’s response to ESMA’s publication on 19 December 2023 of i ...

Publication des rapports du FSB et de l’OICV sur la gestion de la liquidité des ...

ID 26533
Back in Septembr 2023, the AFG responded to corresponding consultations by the FSB and IOS ...

Réponse AFG au Call for Evidence de l’ESMA sur un raccourcissement du cycle de ...

ID 26387
In response to ESMA‘ Call for Evidence regarding the potential reduction of the secu ...

Guide professionnel – Cybersécurité – Guide pratique DORA

ID 26203
The present guide provides a comprehensive overview of DORA and its implications for finan ...
  • Topic Filter

    Top Tag Search
    Top Tag Search
    Top Tag Search
    Top Tag Search
You are on the training version of RISP core with limited functions and data. Please subscribe to RISP core for professional or academic use. We supply free real time datasets for approved academic research; professional subscriptions start at 950€ plus VAT per annum.

Compare Listings