opinion

Réponse de l’AFG à la consultation de la Commission Européenne sur les standards extra-financiers (ESRS)

ID 24141

On June 9 2023, the EC issued a consultation on its proposed Delegated Regulation on the CSRD to incorporate ESRS. The AFG responded on 7 July 2023, expressing support for the EC’s efforts in establishing an effective sustainability reporting framework. AFG also welcomed the adjustments to the ESRS aimed at reducing information requirements to ease administrative burdens and improve reporting readability.
However, AFG raised significant concerns regarding the differentiated treatment of corporates and financial institutions, particularly regarding the materiality assessment of PAI indicators. AFG emphasized the importance of reconciling SFDR PAI indicators and ESRS requirements to enable financial institutions to meet their regulatory obligations without data gaps. The current inconsistency between the frameworks may lead to increased dependency on data providers and additional burden on issuers.
AFG urged the EC to reconsider its position and treat PAI indicators (mandatory and additional) as always material for financial institutions. If the EC maintains the materiality assessment, it should be consistent throughout the SFDR, and any materiality determination must be justified.
Additionally, AFG expressed regret over several changes made by the EC, such as insufficient guidance on defining „material“ indicators, conversion of some mandatory requirements to voluntary ones, reduced information granularity, and a higher threshold for the additional phase-in period.
Climate reporting’s role in achieving global climate objectives was highlighted, and AFG called for the removal of materiality assessments for climate transition plans and targets, ensuring comparability among undertakings. They advocated for making the required information on biodiversity and ecosystems in strategy and business models mandatory again.
AFG emphasized the need for new social PAI indicators proposed by the ESAs to be included in the ESRS and made mandatory once the CSRD disclosure requirements are applicable. Interoperability between reporting frameworks, such as ISSB, SEC, and GRI, was deemed crucial to improve consistency, comparability, and reliability of sustainability reporting and reduce operational burdens for undertakings reporting under the future ESRS.

Other Features
accounting
assessment
bills
CMU
companies
disclosure
due diligence
ESG - environmental factor
ESG - governance factor
ESG - social factor
ESG disclosure
governance
greenwashing
issuer
model
operational
PAI
performance
process
regulatory
reporting
risk
standard
surveys
sustainability
trading venues
transparency
Date Published: 2023-07-11
Regulatory Framework: Sustainable Finance
Regulatory Type: opinion

L’ESMA publie son rapport final portant sur les modifications de la méthodologie ...

ID 26552
The AFG published it’s response to ESMA’s publication on 19 December 2023 of i ...

Publication des rapports du FSB et de l’OICV sur la gestion de la liquidité des ...

ID 26533
Back in Septembr 2023, the AFG responded to corresponding consultations by the FSB and IOS ...

Réponse AFG à la consultation de la Commission Européenne sur la révision du niveau ...

ID 26441
The AFG responded to the EC’s Targeted Consultation on SFDR Implementation. As a rem ...

Réponse AFG au Call for Evidence de l’ESMA sur un raccourcissement du cycle de ...

ID 26387
In response to ESMA‘ Call for Evidence regarding the potential reduction of the secu ...
  • Topic Filter

    Top Tag Search
    Top Tag Search
    Top Tag Search
    Top Tag Search
You are on the training version of RISP core with limited functions and data. Please subscribe to RISP core for professional or academic use. We supply free real time datasets for approved academic research; professional subscriptions start at 950€ plus VAT per annum.

Compare Listings