opinion

Retail Investment Strategy: Positive elements for European Investors and ones that should be reconsidered

ID 25953

EFAMA has actively engaged in the ongoing discussions surrounding the EC’s RIS, currently undergoing scrutiny within the EP and Council. EFAMA has highlighted several positive elements in the strategy, along with crucial areas that warrant reconsideration.
Among the positive elements, EFAMA supports the integration of digital disclosure documents, promoting user-friendly technologies for enhanced accessibility. They also advocate for alignment across different financial products, emphasizing the need for consistency between investment (MiFID) and insurance (IDD) products. Financial literacy initiatives, marketing rules for influencers, and the maintenance of both commission and fee-based models for accessing investment advice are also endorsed.
However, EFAMA recommends reconsiderations in certain aspects of the strategy. They propose the removal of quantitative ‚value-for-money‘ benchmarks, suggesting a shift towards qualitative assessments across the entire value chain, involving product manufacturers and distributors, overseen by NCAs. The association advises against the inclusion of the ’best interest‘ test, proposing an extension of the existing quality enhancement test to cover insurance products.
EFAMA opposes the outright ban on commissions for execution-only trades, as it could hinder access to digital trading platforms. Instead, they recommend applying the quality enhancement test to ensure commissions contribute to improving investor services. The association also cautions against the addition of potentially unclear or repetitive dashboards in investor disclosure documents and proposes a dynamic implementation deadline set 18 months after essential technical standards are developed by ESMA.

Other Features
AIF
AIFM
assessment
benchmark
bills
capital management companies
conflict of interest
disclosure
ELTIF
fees
financial innovation
fund management
insurance
investment firms
investor protection
investor warning
investors
marketing
model
pension funds
performance
process
product governance
prospectus
regulatory
restrictions
retail investors
sales documents
securities
shareholders
standard
statistics
supply chain
sustainability
trading
trading venues
transparency
UCITS
Date Published: 2023-11-27
Regulatory Framework: Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD), Insurance Distribution Directive (IDD), Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II), Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products Regulation (PRIIPs Regulation), Solvency II Directive, Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities Directive (UCITS Directive)
Regulatory Type: opinion

Key messages on the Implementation of SFDR

ID 26440
EFAMA published its response to EC’s targeted consultation on the implementation of SFDR ( ...

Shortening the settlement cycle

ID 26398
EFAMA supports a timely transition to a T+1 settlement cycle for Europe in response to the ...

New EFAMA brochure answers key questions on sustainable investing, to assist EU ...

ID 25962
EFAMA has released a brochure titled „Sustainable Investing Explained in 9 Questions ...

EFAMA Note: Impacts of US T1 on EU Regulation

ID 25655
EFAMA published a paper discussing the potential impacts of the US transitioning to a T+1 ...
  • Topic Filter

    Top Tag Search
    Top Tag Search
    Top Tag Search
    Top Tag Search
You are on the training version of RISP core with limited functions and data. Please subscribe to RISP core for professional or academic use. We supply free real time datasets for approved academic research; professional subscriptions start at 950€ plus VAT per annum.

Compare Listings