opinion

ALFI responds to SFDR review consultation by European Commission

ID 26404

ALFI submitted its response to the European Commission’s targeted consultation concerning the implementation of the SFDR. ALFI’s response outlines several key recommendations for enhancing the current SFDR regime:
Firstly, ALFI proposes that entity level PAI disclosures be adequately addressed under the CSRD without imposing additional disclosure requirements under SFDR. ALFI contends that such duplicative measures contribute minimally to investor understanding.
Secondly, ALFI expresses reservations about expressing product level disclosures on a scale. The organization argues that such an approach is prone to diverse interpretations, hindering the provision of sufficient explanations regarding the relevant ESG approaches.
Furthermore, ALFI advocates for the preservation of the existing SFDR regime, particularly emphasizing the importance of maintaining the disclosure regimes outlined in Article 8 and Article 9 of SFDR. ALFI highlights that market participants have invested substantial financial and implementation efforts in adapting to these regimes, and investors have become accustomed to them over the years.
In addition to endorsing the current SFDR framework, ALFI puts forth a proposal for a voluntary labeling regime alongside SFDR. This suggested regime aims to prevent the de facto use of Articles 8 and 9 as labels while enhancing investor comprehension, particularly among retail investors. ALFI suggests categorizing labels, such as Article 9 for impact and Article 8 for transition, and envisions a flexible approach to investment management. To explore the structural aspects of such labels, ALFI recommends initiating a dedicated consultation process.

Other Features
assessment
benchmark
capital management companies
CMU
disclosure
DNSH
due diligence
eligibility
ESG disclosure
fees
financial advisors
financial stability
fund management
governance
green taxonomy
greenwashing
investor protection
investors
marketing
model
PAI
pension funds
performance
process
registration
regulatory
remuneration
reporting
retail investors
risk
sales documents
shareholders
standard
surveys
sustainability
transparency
Date Published: 2023-12-20
Regulatory Framework: Sustainable Finance
Regulatory Type: opinion

ALFI responds to the ESMA call for evidence on the shortening of the settlement ...

ID 26463
ALFI’s response to ESMA’s call for evidence on the move to T+1/T+0 settlement ...

ALFI responds to the second ESMA’s consultation on proposed RTS/ITS on MiCA

ID 26212
ALFI responded to the second ESMA’s consultation package on Technical Standards spec ...

ALFI responds to the EU Commission’s ‘have your say’ on the proposal for a ...

ID 25536
ALFI responded to the EU Commission’s ‘have your say’ on the proposal for the proposed reg ...

ALFI statement on the conclusion of trialogue negotiations concerning the AIFMD ...

ID 25514
ALFI published as statement on the conclusion of trialogue negotiations concerning the AIF ...
  • Topic Filter

    Top Tag Search
    Top Tag Search
    Top Tag Search
    Top Tag Search
You are on the training version of RISP core with limited functions and data. Please subscribe to RISP core for professional or academic use. We supply free real time datasets for approved academic research; professional subscriptions start at 950€ plus VAT per annum.

Compare Listings