opinion

AFME responds to ESMA consultation on shortening settlement cycles in the EU

ID 26305

AFME has provided a response to ESMA’s CfE on the potential shortening of settlement cycles in the EU (please see EventID#23184). AFME expresses its support for moving to a T+1 settlement cycle but underscores the complexity and demands associated with such a transition. AFME emphasizes the need for careful consideration of feedback before deciding on the next steps.
AFME outlines key points in its response, including full support for ESMA’s view that any decision to shorten the settlement cycle should be based on a thorough cost-benefit analysis. The organization stresses the importance of considering not only the impact on post-trade processes but also the broader market effects on trading, liquidity, and the competitiveness of EU markets. AFME insists that any move to a T+1 settlement cycle must be executed in a way that does not introduce new risks, damage existing market efficiency, or create barriers to investing in the region’s securities markets.
Furthermore, AFME advocates for a coordinated approach across Europe, including EEA countries, Switzerland, and the UK. The organization suggests that the North America migration to T+1 in May 2024 provides an opportunity to learn valuable lessons before making a decision in Europe. However, AFME acknowledges that the complexity of the European post-trade ecosystem could pose additional challenges compared to other jurisdictions.
AFME is actively involved in preparations for the move to T+1 settlement cycles and leads the European Task Force in this regard. The organization’s current areas of focus include assisting members in preparing for the US move to T+1 in 2024, active participation in the UK Accelerated Settlement Task Force, collaboration with other EU stakeholders, and preparing a report on addressing settlement fails and laying the groundwork for T+1.

Other Features
assessment
CCPs
CMU
cooperation
counterparty
CSD
custodian
fees
fund management
investment firms
investors
issuer
liquidity
operational
post trading
process
regulatory
retail investors
risk
securities
settlement
shareholders
standard
surveys
trading
trading venues
Date Published: 2023-12-15
Regulatory Framework: Central Securities Depositories Regulation (CSDR)
Regulatory Type: opinion

Integration, Sustainability and Competitiveness: Reflections and recommendations ...

ID 26333
AFME published a report issuing reflections and recommendations for banking and capital ma ...

AFME welcomes the UK PRA’s publication of elements of Basel 3.1 standards ...

ID 26211
AFME has expressed its approval of the UK PRA release of key components of the Basel 3.1 s ...

AFME welcomes political agreement on EU implementation of final Basel III standards

ID 26105
AFME has welcomed the political agreement reached by the EP and the European Council on th ...

AFME report highlights room for improvement in EU sustainable finance regulation

ID 25842
AFME has recently published a comprehensive report titled “Sustainable Finance in th ...
  • Topic Filter

    Top Tag Search
    Top Tag Search
    Top Tag Search
    Top Tag Search
You are on the training version of RISP core with limited functions and data. Please subscribe to RISP core for professional or academic use. We supply free real time datasets for approved academic research; professional subscriptions start at 950€ plus VAT per annum.

Compare Listings