Q&As

[ESMA70-872942901-35] Q&A on MiFID II and MiFIR transparency topics

ID 22610

The European Securities and Markets Authority, ESMA, has published an updated version of its Questions and Answers (Q&As) on MiFID and MiFIR related transparency topics. In this latest version, the following Q&A 25 in section III, Non-equity transparency, was added, quote:
Question 25: Field 14 “Delivery/cash settlement location” in Table 2 of Annex IV of RTS 2 (transparency reference data), as amended by [Amending Regulation RTS 2], should be populated with a standard code (Energy Identification Code – “EIC”) for electricity and gas contracts. How should Field 14 “Delivery/cash settlement location” for electricity and gas contracts be reported for a) cash settled contracts; b) contracts for which an EIC is not available? (p. 61)
*Answer 25: Field 14 “Delivery/cash settlement location” should be interpreted and reported in the same way for cash settled and physically settled contract with regards to electricity and gas contracts. For example, Field 14 “Delivery/cash settlement location” for a cash settled contract on German power should be reported in the same manner as if the contract was physically settled, i.e. with the EIC “10YDE-RWENET—I”.
The list of available EIC is managed and maintained by ENTSO-E15. Regarding electricity and gas contracts for which an EIC is not available or not appropriate (for example, a market area outside the Energy Internal European Market, or a contract referencing an index), Field 14 “Delivery/cash settlement location” should be populated with an ad-hoc code meeting the following requirements:
a. The format should be the same as the format of EIC, i.e. {ALPHANUM-16};
b. Generic values such as “CASH”, “UNKNOWN” or the name of the CCP clearing the contract should not be used;
c. The text in the ad-hoc code should provide a- clear indication of the reference of the contract. Valid ad-hoc codes that are currently in use, are provided in the table below. You may contact data-statistics@esma.europa.eu to request an update of the list.
Valid ad-hoc codes

Other Features
best execution
CCPs
clearing
market data
reporting
securities
settlement
standard
statistics
trading
transparency
Date Published: 2023-03-31
Regulatory Framework: Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR), Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II)
Regulatory Type: Q&As

[JC 2023 82 ] List of Financial Conglomerates 2023

ID 26470
The three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) have published a revised list of firms c ...

ESMA consults on possible changes to the securitisation disclosure templates

ID 26449
ESMA has initiated a consultation on potential changes to the securitisation disclosure te ...

ESAs propose extending the EMIR equity option exemption

ID 26434
The ESAs have proposed a two-year extension to the equity option exemption from bilateral ...

[ESMA84-2037069784-2106 ] Report on CRA Market Share Calculation 2023

ID 26412
In order to enhance market competition among credit rating agencies (CRA) and to foster th ...
  • Topic Filter

    Top Tag Search
    Top Tag Search
    Top Tag Search
    Top Tag Search
You are on the training version of RISP core with limited functions and data. Please subscribe to RISP core for professional or academic use. We supply free real time datasets for approved academic research; professional subscriptions start at 950€ plus VAT per annum.

Compare Listings